When you reach for an onion in your kitchen, you might not think twice about its journey from the field to your countertop. However, the energy required to grow, process, and transport an onion, along with the potential waste it generates, can be surprisingly high. Let’s compare two common methods for preserving onions: mechanically air-dried fresh onions stored in a cool warehouse versus chopped, frozen onions.
This comparison not only uncovers the complexities of handling something as simple as an onion but also highlights broader implications for our entire food supply chain.
Process 1: Fresh Onions – Mechanically Air-Dried and Stored
1. Energy Consumption
In the first scenario, fresh onions are harvested and then mechanically air-dried to extend their shelf life. This drying process requires energy for large fans and dehumidifiers, which must run continuously to maintain optimal conditions. Once dried, the onions are stored in cool warehouses until needed by shops or retailers. The warehouses, typically kept at around 0-5°C (32-41°F), consume a significant amount of energy for cooling, lighting, and air circulation.
2. Potential Waste
The fresh onion supply chain is prone to waste at multiple stages:
Transportation: Fresh onions are transported over long distances, often resulting in damage due to rough handling, temperature fluctuations, or exposure to moisture. A portion of these onions may spoil or become unfit for sale before reaching the store.
Retail and Household Waste: Once at the store, onions may sit on shelves for extended periods. Consumers may purchase more onions than they need, leading to spoilage at home. Additionally, when preparing fresh onions, many people discard the outer layers and any damaged or blemished sections, further increasing waste.
3. Summary of Energy and Waste
Overall, the energy required to dry, store, and transport fresh onions is substantial. The multi-step process, coupled with potential losses at each stage, results in significant waste. According to estimates, up to 30-40% of fresh produce, including onions, can be wasted across the supply chain and in households.
Process 2: Chopped, Frozen Onions
1. Energy Consumption
In the second scenario, fresh onions are harvested, quickly processed (peeled, chopped, and blanched), and then flash-frozen at a processing facility. Flash freezing requires energy but is a rapid process designed to preserve the onion’s flavour, texture, and nutritional value.
Frozen onions are stored in large freezers, which, while energy-intensive, can hold large quantities of product for extended periods without significant deterioration. The frozen onions are then transported in refrigerated trucks to retailers, where they are stored in freezers until sold.
2. Potential Waste
Frozen onions have a distinct advantage in terms of waste:
Minimal Waste: Because frozen onions are pre-chopped and portioned, consumers use only what they need, reducing the likelihood of food waste at home. Any unused onions can be returned to the freezer, preserving them for future use.
Consistent Quality: Frozen onions are less susceptible to damage during transport or storage, reducing losses compared to fresh onions. The freezing process also halts the degradation of the onion, ensuring that they maintain their quality over a longer period.
3. Summary of Energy and Waste
While freezing onions consumes energy, it offers a more controlled and efficient process. The total waste generated is minimized, as all parts of the onion are used effectively. Furthermore, the energy used in freezing and cold storage may be offset by the reduction in spoilage and waste throughout the supply chain.
Comparing the Two Methods
To determine which method is more sustainable, we must consider both energy consumption and waste generation:
Energy Use: Fresh onions require energy for drying, storage, and transportation, with additional energy costs if they spoil and must be replaced. Frozen onions, while energy-intensive to freeze and store, benefit from lower waste levels, potentially making them more efficient overall.
Waste Generation: Fresh onions experience higher rates of waste at multiple stages of the supply chain, from transport to retail to home use. In contrast, frozen onions have a low waste profile since they are used in precise amounts, and unused portions remain preserved for future use.
Broader Implications for the Food Supply Chain
The energy and waste considerations for onions extend to other fresh fruits and vegetables in the supply chain. For example, delicate produce like berries, greens, and herbs are particularly vulnerable to spoilage, leading to substantial waste. Frozen and canned foods offer an alternative that can reduce waste, stabilize prices, and ensure a consistent supply of nutritious foods year-round.
Frozen Foods: The freezing process locks in nutrients, flavour, and texture, offering a reliable way to store and consume foods without significant waste. However, energy costs for freezing and storage are considerable, especially if fossil fuels power the energy source.
Canned Foods: Canned foods provide a stable, shelf-ready option that can last for years without the need for refrigeration. The canning process requires heating, which consumes energy, but this is balanced by the low waste levels, long shelf life, and minimal storage costs. Moreover, canned foods do not rely on constant refrigeration, potentially reducing overall energy consumption compared to frozen goods.
Conclusion: Fresh, Frozen, or Canned?
The debate over whether fresh, frozen, or canned is the best option for fruits and vegetables is complex. For onions, and likely many other vegetables, frozen products may offer a middle ground: they balance energy use with reduced waste and consistent quality. Canned foods also provide a highly stable and energy-efficient solution, particularly in regions with unreliable refrigeration.
Ultimately, the choice between fresh, frozen, or canned depends on factors like local infrastructure, consumer habits, and the specific types of produce being considered. However, it’s clear that for something as simple as an onion, the energy and waste involved in its journey to our kitchens are far from straightforward, challenging us to rethink our food choices in the context of sustainability and resource management.
While You Are Here…
Why not use one or all of Bryce Energy Services free online calculators.
Carbon Footprint — Solar Panels — Electric Chargers — ISO 50001 Gap Analysis


Measure - Manage - Reduce - Offset - Report
Bryce Energy Services combines practical energy and carbon consultancy with the CO₂ Impact online platform, helping businesses measure their emissions, meet reporting requirements and turn carbon data into achievable reduction projects.
With CO₂ Impact, your business can:
Unlike a standalone carbon calculator, we can help you interpret the results, investigate energy-saving opportunities and prioritise projects based on cost, carbon savings and practical deliverability.
CO₂ Impact subscriptions start from £29 per month.