The UK government’s announcement of a £22 billion investment in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is part of its wider effort to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050. The concept behind carbon capture is relatively simple: remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from industrial emissions before it can enter the atmosphere and contribute to climate change.
But while it might sound like a silver bullet, carbon capture faces significant practical, economic, and ethical challenges that make many question whether this is the best route to address the climate crisis.
What is Carbon Capture and What is it Supposed to Do?
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a technology designed to capture up to 90% of the CO2 emissions produced from the use of fossil fuels in electricity generation and industrial processes. Once captured, the CO2 is then transported via pipelines or ships and stored in geological formations deep underground, such as depleted oil and gas fields, preventing it from being released into the atmosphere.
The CCS process can be broken down into three stages:
- Capture: CO2 is separated from other gases produced in industrial processes or power generation.
- Transport: The captured CO2 is compressed and transported, typically through pipelines.
- Storage: The CO2 is injected into underground rock formations where it is expected to remain for hundreds or even thousands of years.
The idea behind CCS is that it allows for the continued use of fossil fuels or carbon-intensive industrial processes like steel and cement production, without contributing to atmospheric CO2 levels, thus enabling a gradual transition to a low-carbon economy.
The Big Issues with Carbon Capture and Storage
While the theory behind CCS is promising, the technology has several significant challenges and drawbacks.
Allowing Carbon-Intensive Processes to Continue Without Addressing the Root Problem
One of the main criticisms of carbon capture is that it could allow industries and governments to continue with business as usual. Instead of phasing out fossil fuel use or reforming carbon-intensive industries, CCS offers a technological band-aid that doesn’t address the underlying issue: our reliance on carbon-heavy processes. Critics argue that this delays the inevitable transition to renewable energy and cleaner industrial methods, and could perpetuate the fossil fuel industry.
Practical Challenges of Capturing Carbon from Industrial Exhausts
The technology to capture CO2 from exhaust gases is complex. Most emissions come from industrial processes that generate not just CO2 but a cocktail of other gases and particulates. Separating the CO2 from this mix requires significant technical intervention, such as chemical solvents or filters. While some large facilities might be retrofitted for CCS, not all existing infrastructure is compatible, making widespread adoption a logistical and financial challenge.
Energy Requirements to Extract and Purify CO2
Capturing, purifying, and compressing CO2 is an energy-intensive process. Ironically, many carbon capture technologies require additional energy, often from the same fossil fuels that are generating the CO2 in the first place. This creates a paradox where the technology meant to reduce emissions could, in some cases, lead to higher overall energy use and, therefore, emissions unless powered by renewable energy sources.
The Logistics of Building a CO2 Transport Network
Once captured, CO2 must be transported to storage sites, often via pipelines. Building an entirely new infrastructure to connect existing facilities to a CCS network is a monumental undertaking. Not only is it expensive, but it also raises safety concerns, as transporting high-pressure CO2 over long distances introduces risks of leaks. Constructing this infrastructure in time to meet climate targets presents yet another hurdle.
Storage and Compression Challenges
To store CO2, it must be compressed into a liquid form, which again requires significant energy. The CO2 is then pumped into underground storage facilities, such as depleted oil and gas fields. While these sites are generally considered stable, there are long-term concerns about potential leaks or the environmental impact of injecting large amounts of CO2 underground. Additionally, not every region has access to such geological formations, meaning countries may have to rely on cross-border transportation and storage agreements.
Is Carbon Capture Just a Long Shot?
Many climate experts argue that CCS is, at best, a gamble when it comes to addressing the climate crisis. While it has the potential to play a role in decarbonizing certain industries, such as cement and steel production, the broader consensus is that CCS cannot be relied on as the main solution to achieving net zero. The International Energy Agency (IEA) has noted that even under optimistic projections, CCS would only account for about 10% of the global emissions reductions needed by 2050.
Would the Money Be Better Spent Elsewhere?
Given the challenges associated with CCS, some argue that the £22 billion pledged by the UK government could be better spent on more proven and effective technologies. For example:
- Upgrading the Electricity Grid: With renewable energy sources like wind and solar becoming cheaper and more scalable, investment in upgrading the electricity grid to handle distributed, renewable generation would help accelerate the transition to clean energy.
- Expanding the EV Charger Network: Transportation remains a significant source of emissions. Expanding the electric vehicle (EV) charger network would encourage more people to adopt electric vehicles, helping to decarbonize the transport sector.
- Subsidizing Heat Pumps: The UK has a huge task ahead in reducing emissions from home heating, much of which currently relies on gas. Subsidizing the installation of heat pumps could help decarbonize domestic heating, one of the largest sources of carbon emissions.
Conclusion
While carbon capture and storage is an exciting and potentially useful technology, it is far from a guaranteed solution to the climate crisis. The technical, logistical, and financial challenges it faces raise serious questions about whether it can deliver on its promise. Moreover, relying too heavily on CCS risks perpetuating the use of fossil fuels, delaying the necessary transition to cleaner, more sustainable energy systems.
Investing in proven solutions, such as renewable energy infrastructure and decarbonizing transport and heating, may ultimately offer a faster and more effective path to achieving net zero emissions.
While You Are Here…
Why not use one or all of Bryce Energy Services free online calculators.
Carbon Footprint — Solar Panels — Electric Chargers — ISO 50001 Gap Analysis
Blog News Carbon Footprint
The Carbon Cost of Building the Future: Why Capital Projects Need Their Own Carbon Accounts
Across the UK, enormous amounts of capital are being invested in new infrastructure. Electricity networks [...]
Oct
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Carbon Accounting Without Adding Another Job to the Business
For many businesses, the biggest barrier to carbon reporting is not necessarily the calculation itself. [...]
Sep
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Your Carbon Footprint Is Only as Good as the Data Your Suppliers Give You
For many businesses, calculating Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions is relatively straightforward. You can [...]
Sep
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Stop Measuring Carbon in Isolation: Use the Metrics That Already Run Your Business
Most businesses understand the basic idea of carbon reporting: Measure emissions this year. Measure them [...]
Aug
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Net Zero to 2050: Perhaps the Carbon Plan Should Become the Business Plan
For many businesses, 2050 feels a very long way away. Most organisations rarely plan in [...]
Aug
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Climate Change Has Not Gone Away Because a Council Votes to Stop Calling It an Emergency
There can hardly be a worse time for councils to start reversing climate emergency declarations. [...]
Aug
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Your Profit and Loss Account Is Not a Carbon Footprint
Carbon accounting is becoming increasingly important to businesses of every size. Customers are requesting emissions [...]
Aug
Blog News Sustainability
A Billion Plastic Pellets on Our Doorstep — Where Is the Urgency?
A significant environmental incident is unfolding on the beaches of North East England, yet beyond [...]
Jul
Blog News Carbon Footprint
Net Zero Airports? We Need to Talk About Facilitated Emissions
Airports are increasingly publishing impressive carbon-reduction claims. “Airport emissions reduced by 50%.” “Carbon-neutral operations.” “Net [...]
Jul
Measure - Manage - Reduce - Offset - Report
Bryce Energy Services combines practical energy and carbon consultancy with the CO₂ Impact online platform, helping businesses measure their emissions, meet reporting requirements and turn carbon data into achievable reduction projects.
With CO₂ Impact, your business can:
Unlike a standalone carbon calculator, we can help you interpret the results, investigate energy-saving opportunities and prioritise projects based on cost, carbon savings and practical deliverability.
CO₂ Impact subscriptions start from £29 per month.