Across the UK and Europe, Energy from Waste (EfW) plants are becoming a common feature of the waste management system. The idea appears simple: rather than burying rubbish in landfill, burn it in controlled facilities and generate electricity and heat.
Supporters describe this as recovering value from waste, reducing landfill use and generating low-carbon energy. Critics see it as burning valuable materials and releasing large amounts of CO₂.
Both views contain some truth.
To understand whether Energy from Waste is truly “green”, we need to look more closely at what is actually in the waste being burned, how the process works, and what emissions are produced.
What Actually Goes Into Energy from Waste Plants?
EfW plants typically burn residual municipal waste. This is the material that remains after recycling and sorting have taken place.
The composition of residual waste varies by country and region, but typical UK municipal waste contains roughly the following materials:
| Material | Approximate Share | Carbon Source |
|---|---|---|
| Food and organic waste | 15–30% | Biogenic |
| Paper and cardboard | 10–20% | Biogenic |
| Plastics | 10–25% | Fossil-derived |
| Textiles | 5–10% | Mixed |
| Wood | 2–5% | Biogenic |
| Rubber and leather | 2–4% | Mostly fossil |
| Metals | 5–10% | Non-combustible |
| Glass | 3–8% | Non-combustible |
| Other materials | 5–10% | Mixed |
Only the combustible fraction actually produces energy. Metals and glass are largely inert and end up in the ash.
The key climate question is the carbon source of the material.
Biogenic Carbon
Biogenic materials come from plants and biological sources. These include:
Food waste
Paper and cardboard
Wood
Natural fibres such as cotton
When these materials burn, they release CO₂ that was originally absorbed from the atmosphere during plant growth. In greenhouse gas accounting, this carbon is often treated differently because it is part of the short-term carbon cycle.
Fossil-Derived Carbon
Other materials originate from fossil fuels and introduce new carbon to the atmosphere when burned.
These include:
Plastics (polyethylene, PET, polypropylene, PVC)
Synthetic textiles (polyester, nylon)
Rubber products
Some packaging materials
Plastic alone can represent over half of the fossil carbon emissions from EfW plants.
How Energy from Waste Plants Work
Modern EfW plants are essentially large industrial boilers designed for mixed waste fuel.
The process generally follows several stages.
1. Waste Delivery and Storage
Waste arrives by truck and is tipped into a large bunker. Operators mix the waste using cranes to ensure a relatively consistent fuel composition.
2. Combustion
Waste is fed onto a moving grate furnace, where it burns at temperatures typically between 850°C and 1100°C.
At these temperatures:
Organic material combusts
Plastics melt and burn
Metals and minerals remain as solid residues
3. Steam and Electricity Generation
Heat from the furnace converts water into high-pressure steam, which drives turbines to generate electricity.
Some plants also operate as combined heat and power (CHP) systems, supplying district heating networks.
4. Flue Gas Cleaning
Modern facilities include multiple emission control systems designed to remove harmful substances.
These systems typically remove:
Particulates (dust)
Acid gases (hydrogen chloride, sulphur dioxide)
Nitrogen oxides
Heavy metals
Dioxins and furans
Only cleaned gases are released through the stack.
5. Residues and Ash
After combustion, roughly 20–30% of the original waste mass remains as ash.
This includes:
Bottom ash (minerals, metals)
Fly ash (fine particles captured in filters)
Metals can often be recovered from bottom ash and recycled.
How Much CO₂ Does Energy from Waste Produce?
Burning waste inevitably produces CO₂.
Typical emissions range between:
0.7 – 1.2 tonnes of CO₂ per tonne of waste burned
The exact value depends heavily on the plastic content of the waste.
Plastics have a high calorific value and release significant fossil carbon when burned.
To put this in energy terms:
EfW plants typically produce around 500–700 kWh of electricity per tonne of waste.
That means the carbon intensity of electricity from EfW can be similar to natural gas power generation, particularly when the fossil content of waste is high.
Other Emissions from Waste Combustion
In addition to CO₂, waste combustion can produce other gases and pollutants.
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Formed during high-temperature combustion and contribute to air pollution.
Sulphur Dioxide (SO₂)
Produced when sulphur-containing materials burn.
Hydrogen Chloride (HCl)
Generated when PVC plastics are burned.
Dioxins and Furans
These are toxic compounds that can form when chlorine-containing materials combust. Modern plants carefully control combustion temperatures and use filters to prevent their release.
Particulates
Fine dust particles captured by filtration systems.
Modern plants are heavily regulated and typically operate well below emission limits.
Why EfW Can Still Be Better Than Landfill
Despite the emissions from burning waste, EfW can still offer climate benefits compared with landfill.
The key issue is methane.
When biodegradable waste decomposes in landfill without oxygen, it produces methane (CH₄).
Methane has a global warming potential around 28–34 times greater than CO₂ over 100 years.
Even with landfill gas capture systems, a significant portion of methane escapes into the atmosphere.
By burning waste instead, EfW plants:
Convert methane-producing waste into CO₂ instead
Generate electricity and heat
Reduce landfill volumes by around 90%
From a climate perspective, converting methane risk into controlled CO₂ emissions can be beneficial.
The Waste Hierarchy
Environmental policy generally follows the waste hierarchy, which ranks waste management options from best to worst.
Reduce waste generation
Reuse materials
Recycle materials
Recover energy (Energy from Waste)
Landfill disposal
Energy from Waste sits near the bottom, but still above landfill.
This reflects the fact that burning materials destroys resources that could potentially be reused or recycled.
The Lock-In Problem
One criticism of EfW is the long lifespan of the plants.
Facilities often operate for 25–40 years and require a steady supply of waste to remain economically viable.
This can create a structural dependency:
If waste volumes fall due to recycling and reduction policies, EfW plants may struggle financially.
Some critics argue this could discourage policies that significantly reduce waste generation.
The Bigger System Question
Energy from Waste is not really an energy technology — it is primarily a waste management technology with energy as a by-product.
Its role depends heavily on how successful we are at reducing waste overall.
If we dramatically improve:
Product design
Recycling systems
Circular economy practices
Packaging reduction
then the need for Energy from Waste could decline over time.
But as long as societies produce large volumes of residual waste, EfW remains one of the least damaging ways to deal with it compared with landfill.
Final Thought
Burning waste is not a perfect environmental solution. It releases CO₂, destroys materials, and raises legitimate concerns about long-term waste policy.
However, compared with landfill methane emissions and uncontrolled waste disposal, Energy from Waste can play a transitional role in managing residual waste while generating useful energy.
Perhaps the real challenge is not deciding whether to burn waste or bury it — but asking why we produce so much disposable material in the first place.
While You Are Here…
Why not use one or all of Bryce Energy Services free online calculators.
Carbon Footprint — Solar Panels — Electric Chargers — ISO 50001 Gap Analysis
Or demonstrate your business is environmentally and socially responsible, with the CSR Accreditation.
Try our ‘new’ New Vehicle Carbon Footprint Calculator now.
Measure - Manage - Reduce - Offset - Report
Bryce Energy Services combines practical energy and carbon consultancy with the CO₂ Impact online platform, helping businesses measure their emissions, meet reporting requirements and turn carbon data into achievable reduction projects.
With CO₂ Impact, your business can:
Unlike a standalone carbon calculator, we can help you interpret the results, investigate energy-saving opportunities and prioritise projects based on cost, carbon savings and practical deliverability.
CO₂ Impact subscriptions start from £29 per month.